3400 performance build, which direction?

[Bridgetown]

There is probabley a couple more hp left in the motor too with some tunning. When I did that dyno run my engine was running off a stock tune for an '95 iron head 3.4. I have since upgraded to the 7730 with the 3400 tune from WOT tech. I haven't dynoed since changing the computer.

[Google Adsense]

[Bridgetown]

I've seen a 3.4 DOHC turbo (with stock internals) running ~10psi IIRC. I think he even daily drives it. I know he's on Pennocks. I know his first name was Matt, but I don't remember his last name. Think about the tight quarters in that bay along with the heat build up. He's had it going for a few years now. A turbo might be easier and less problematic than you realize. Not to mention it would be totally street friendly vs a huge cammed out monster performance rebuild on a NA car. The consensus is the more you push something NA, the less streetable it gets from what I've read in my years of messing with cars. Don't take this the wrong way, but I don't think you realize how strong stock internals really are in these engines. There's been a number of people going 10+ psi on stock engines, not to mention look how long they last completely stock. I bet a well cared for and maintained 3400 would last over 300k miles, which in itself is a testament to it's strength. GM didn't want these engines to be complete crap because of how many vehicles they went in. That would be a huge repair bill for them if they failed early in life, so they built them well.

Is intercooling necessary if I am staying under 10 psi? What kind of power can I expect by adding say, 7 psi to a completely stock 3400?

[Rootie524]

you should always intercool IMHO. keep that air cool..especially (like you said) cuz u have a mid engine.

[pocket-rocket]

you should always intercool IMHO. keep that air cool..especially (like you said) cuz u have a mid engine.

I agree with Rootie. It's NEVER a bad thing to intercool a boost setup. I'm not experienced with boosting 3400's, so I'll leave the 7psi question to someone more qualified. But, FWIW, with one atmosphere (14.7psi) if you are pushing 178, you should theoretically see almost an 89 hp increase from running almost another half atmosphere of pressure (in a perfect world).

[Superdave]

excuse be for being dumb but do you have the dohc 3.4 or just the ohv 3.4? cuz my 3.1 ohv w/ a cam only made 146 whp i cant image 3.1-3.4 is that much of a difference if they are both ohv

Stock 3400 5 speed swapped jbodies put down 180-200 WHP all day long depending on the dyno.

[Rootie524]

so to account for the difference like pocket-rocket stated..its mostly drive train loss cuz of my 4spd auto.. i dont want to thread jack too much but is there a way to change FDR and gears in a 4t45e? is there a thread already or should i start a new one.

[bszopi]

Yes, you can. Will it help out your drivetrain loss? Nope... And yes, there are threads discussing building up and modifying a 4T4x-E.

[Rootie524]

so changing gear ratios wont help drive train loss but it would help me see more power (acceleration) at the wheels, right?

[pocket-rocket]

so changing gear ratios wont help drive train loss but it would help me see more power (acceleration) at the wheels, right?

The down side to regearing that way is your rpms at highway speed goes up and can hurt highway economy if you go with gears too far oriented towards acceleration. That's why Borg Warner is making an aftermarket T56 (6 speed manual) that is aimed at old classics since most of those (that are manual) have a 4 speed. They might run 11's in the 1/4, but no one wants to howl down the highway at 60mph at 4000 rpms.

[Rootie524]

yeah thats very true but i wouldnt go that crazy..just improve it alittle. the gears are huge and it pisses me off..but i also like maxing out at around 130mph..that would go away if i changed gears for acceleration like u said.