little random post

[robertisaar]

got bored, started cross-referencing things...


Earliest 3100 injectors, i think...

slightly later revision, i think...

supposedly, 17.7 lb/hr and 18.2 lb/hr...

http://www.fuelinjector.citymaker.com/PONTIAC_FUEL_INJECTORS.html

looks to be a great cross-reference...

[robertisaar]

anyone else find this odd?

i've always been under the impression that a narrowband's rich/lean threshold(compared to 14.7:1) was between .45 and .55... not .35. this is from a narrowband simulator BTW.

[robertisaar]

the liquid cooled harleys are 60* V-twins.

[pocket-rocket]

The 2011 Mustang gets a 305 hp 60* v6 and a choice between 6 speed auto (same one used in the F150 Raptor) or a 6 speed manual. It seems Ford is copying Chevy, except I don't believe the Camaro has an option of a 6 speed transmission (auto or manual ).

The 2011 Ford Mustang will receive a new all-aluminum 3.7 liter DOHC V6 engine. The new engine featuring twin independent variable camshaft timing, will churn out an impressive 305 horsepower and 280 lb-ft of torque. An automatic six speed transmission and a manual six speed transmission will be available as compared to the five speed transmissions available on the 2010 Mustang.

http://www.nitrobahn.com/news/2011-mustang-gets-v6-engine/

[robertisaar]

camaro has both!

good to see ford came to it's senses about the ancient 3.8/3.9 design...

[bszopi]

The 2011 Mustang gets a 305 hp 60* v6 and a choice between 6 speed auto (same one used in the F150 Raptor) or a 6 speed manual. It seems Ford is copying Chevy, except I don't believe the Camaro has an option of a 6 speed transmission (auto or manual ).

Camaro is a 312hp, and does in fact offer both a 6-spd manual and 6-spd automatic (for $995 more).

[pocket-rocket]

Well, that's good news The Mustangs do look nice, but out of all of the "retro" cars, Dodge included, I think GM did the best job with the Camaro.

[robertisaar]

whoops, seems the mustangs went from the 3.8 to the 4.0, which was a 60* motor.

the 4.0 still only made 210HP though. LOL

[pocket-rocket]

And GM pulled that one out of their hat with 3.4 liters years ago I bet the 4.0 has more torque though. I'm willing to bet it's the same engine used in the Rangers, so it's a 2v engine, not a high reving screamer. I believe it's a SOHC, though.

[robertisaar]

indeed, supposedly makes ~245 lb-ft of torque or something close to it.

but it's hard to make torque without displacement or boost.

[robertisaar]

insanity?







oh, and they're functional!



so far, only on the A1 mask, though i may port them to $DF and $8F(and potentially others) as well, if there is anyone to test it for me.

and when i get home, main spark shall be the same.

[SappySE107]

Wow, does that take the place of the base VE table as well?

[robertisaar]

well, i more or less disabled the base VE table, since the calc'd VE from the 2D and 3D tables was added together and stored as an 8 bit variable, so there was no longer a reason to have it.

now i just need a motor that can spin to 8400

[Jonpro03]

Build a 3900 to do it

[robertisaar]

funny you should mention that... i may be using one of the +12V PWM outputs on a 1227727/16149396 to control the VVT solenoid actually, should i be able to get my hands on a 3900...

i just need to get some more info on the system first.