quad 4 vs ecotec-do they compare?

[no_doz]

wow im not entirely sure ive met you before, where have you been hiding?

[gpse3400]

the pre "Twin Cam('96 I think)" Quad 4 was a rough engine. Plus it also had head gasket issues..But they sounded nice at idle....Nothing like what a 4 cylinder should. It almost sounded like the 60 Degree V6 at idle and low RPM.

[no_doz]

i wouldnt be surprised if brad has a blueprint of either and/or both of these engines...lol

[bszopi]

Yeah, it used to be available, but has since been taken down. I think I still have it at home as well, but I'd have to dig through some folders to find it. And of course, I'm not at home right now to do so...

[carbon]

http://www.gmtechbooks.com/build.html

GM SPORT COMPACT
PERFORMANCE BUILD BOOK
THIRD EDITION
88958728

Er... um... I might have that in PDF form....

[no_doz]

i was going to say-isnt the ecotec like a detuned WAY updated version of the quad 4 made for emissions? if you dont have emissions in your area & open both engines up-is the extra .2l enough to make the ecotec compare to the quad 4?

[mickaz]

quad 4 (180HP) vs the 2.4 ecotec ( 177HP) the Quad 4 is more powerfull. but the engine got a lot of reliability issues. I had one before and I actually prefer the 3x00 series then the Quad 4 for the fact that I dont have to break in my engine very years.

[asylummotorsports]

^^Now THAT is a CAI that probably works!!^^^

[bszopi]

GM SPORT COMPACT
PERFORMANCE BUILD BOOK
THIRD EDITION
88958728

This handbook describes parts and procedures used to prepare ECOTEC Race Engines used by GM Racing in professional sport compact drag racing, as well as engine, transmission, and chassis modifications designed for, sportsman-level drag racers and road racers.

This handbook is intended to be used by experienced and knowledgeable race engine and chassis builders. It does not cover basic engine blueprinting and assembly procedures, since it is assumed that the reader is already familiar with machining, measuring, and inspecting the componentes. Some of the procedures described require specialized tools and skills.

Price $ 14.95

http://www.gmtechbooks.com/build.html

[geoffinbc]

The Ecotec is way better. And there is no water pump problems like the Q4.

In stock form the Ecotec makes less power because it was restricted by harsher OBDII emissions and it was dropped into an Econo Car. But the foundation is there fur a far more powerful motor. RPM potential is simply a matter of camshaft selection.

[robertisaar]

GM has built an Ecotec up to 1200hp, and provided a manual with all the PNs on how to do it. Nuff said...

i don't suppose they offer a warranty?

1200hp with any amount of cylinders is bad-ass in my book.

[bszopi]

GM has built an Ecotec up to 1200hp, and provided a manual with all the PNs on how to do it. Nuff said...

[1988GTU]

I prefer the quad 4 (2.3L) . It just shines past 4,500 rpm's and when modded right, can be really fast N/A. Spend some coin going FI, it'll blow your mind. I think there are a few turbo quads and each one is over 300hp iirc. The one SC quad out there is more than likely over 300 hp too. All cars are daily drivers or atleast very streetable.

[pocket-rocket]

I like the Cobalt SS, but if I had my choice for free, it would be an AWD Jetta FTW.

[SofaKingWeToddDid]

i really love those turbo Ecos too!! and totally agree, if i was to get a small car, thats it! screw honda, ford, dodge, toyota, and VW.... any others?? well, i hate to say it, but i really like alot of the new ford cars!! haha