Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

LX9 RWD Swap - timing cover and pump specifics

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by shapeshaver View Post
    Dave, did you look for a spring loaded tensioner that would work before making your post mounted Idler? Once I have all my pulleys in place, where do I find a serpentine belt that is just the right length?

    With my original belt routing, I had one on there. I didn't use one the second time around just to clean up the look of the engine.

    you can see how it looked with the 3.4 brackets here:


    I had it mounted in the original A/C compressor spot with a custom bracket. I think it was a stock 3.4 tensioner but i had so many parts mixed around that i'm not 100% sure.


    Once everything is in place, measure it with string and remember to subtract a little for the swing of the tensioner. Be prepared to make a few trips to the parts store.
    Last edited by Superdave; 06-18-2014, 07:23 AM.
    Past Builds;
    1991 Z24, 3500/5 Spd. 275WHP/259WTQ 13.07@108 MPH
    1989 Camaro RS, ITB-3500/700R4. 263WHP/263WTQ 13.52@99.2 MPH
    Current Project;
    1972 Nova 12.73@105.7 MPH

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Superdave View Post
      With my original belt routing, I had one on there. I didn't use one the second time around just to clean up the look of the engine.

      you can see how it looked with the 3.4 brackets here:


      I had it mounted in the original A/C compressor spot with a custom bracket. I think it was a stock 3.4 tensioner but i had so many parts mixed around that i'm not 100% sure.


      Once everything is in place, measure it with string and remember to subtract a little for the swing of the tensioner. Be prepared to make a few trips to the parts store.
      I'd thought I tried the F-Body brackets without an AC compressor and the tensioner was ineffective. I got an A/C delete kit that put an idler pulley in place of the compressor and ran that for a while.

      As for measuring, if you have an old belt, my vice-grip trick worked really well. Puts the belt under proper tension, and the vice-grips leave nice witness marks to measure off of. I got mine right on the first try.

      '98 Volvo V90 - Ford 5.0 swap in progress
      '96 LR Range Rover 4.6 HSE - suspiciously reliable
      '92 Volvo 740 Wagon - former parts car, now daily-driver beater
      '71 Opel Kadett Wagon - 1.9L CIH w/ Weber DGV 32/36, in bits

      Comment


      • #63
        Well , I just ordered a CW Fiero pump. I don't anticipate having any accessories in the future so I had a moment of clarity and "chose simple". Now on to the MANY other issues involved with this swap...
        1962 Sunbeam Alpine
        www.lx9alpine.com
        LX9 swap in progress

        Comment


        • #64
          LX9 RWD Swap - timing cover and pump specifics

          Did you order a matching timing cover as well? You need one from an 87-88 Fiero to work with a CW pump.
          '89 Firebird, 3500 Turbo, T56, 9-bolt/4.11
          '86 Fiero, 3500, 4-speed

          Comment


          • #65
            Yep, I already have a new one. Just have to TIG up the hole.
            1962 Sunbeam Alpine
            www.lx9alpine.com
            LX9 swap in progress

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Canyonero View Post
              What did you do for belt routing on this project you mentioned? I have an LX9 that I want to put in an Opel which also has manual steering, so the only accessory would be the alternator.
              Originally posted by The_Raven View Post
              I haven't got to that project yet, but it's getting closer to the top of the list.
              Well, I'm getting to that project.

              I have two different belt routing arrangements, depending on where I place the dowel for the tensioner (modified to be removable).

              This is how I believe I'm going to route the belt:
              BeltRouting1.jpg

              This is the alternate:
              BeltRouting2.jpg

              I had to use an idler, but could have either used a (much) larger pulley on the tensioner (or alternator) or moved the alternator up, or some combination of both. I already had the alternator mount welded up solid by then, so I chose to go with the idler pulley.

              Comment


              • #67
                I'd opt for the alternate. If you put the belt on the underside of the idler that is next to the alternator, does it clear the w-pump? If it doesn't, a smaller dia idler pulley is available that can create clearance.
                Lifting my front wheels, one jack at a time.

                Comment


                • #68
                  There's no reason that the alternator has to go on that side, is there? Is there enough slack in the harness to move it?
                  I think I'd like mine on the opposite side just to give the steering linkage more room.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    There's no reason that the alternator has to go there, no, it just fit there very well, and keeps the entire package tight. The driver side head being the one that is father back allows the alternator to sit in that open space.

                    The idler is there to have the belt clear the water pump. If the belt cleared it without, there would be no idler. There's no belt clearance issues with how the belt is routed now, hence why it's routed the way it is. I've fabricated every mount so parts are placed where I want them to be.

                    I was only showing what I came up with since I was asked long ago how I did it, or would end up doing it previously in this thread.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      I prefer this layout. Simple, and works well.

                      My firebird uses a very similar layout with a power steering pump added below the alternator.
                      '89 Firebird, 3500 Turbo, T56, 9-bolt/4.11
                      '86 Fiero, 3500, 4-speed

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        It's simple, but lacks the spring loaded tensioner, which is a self imposed requirement.

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by The_Raven View Post
                          There's no reason that the alternator has to go there, no, it just fit there very well, and keeps the entire package tight. The driver side head being the one that is father back allows the alternator to sit in that open space.

                          The idler is there to have the belt clear the water pump. If the belt cleared it without, there would be no idler. There's no belt clearance issues with how the belt is routed now, hence why it's routed the way it is. I've fabricated every mount so parts are placed where I want them to be.

                          I was only showing what I came up with since I was asked long ago how I did it, or would end up doing it previously in this thread.
                          I honestly just brain farted over the positioning of the left side pulley system lol.

                          Too bad the tensioner couldnt be rotated counterclockwise about 2.75" to make the idler history on the alternate design.
                          Lifting my front wheels, one jack at a time.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            I know. There is no tension on the belt if I did that.
                            Raising the tensioner creates clearance issues with the heater hose. So these are the best two layouts possible, without re-working everything.

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              I know its old but its a good thread. Still not sure if I will pull the trigger on a LX9 swap but it still interests me.
                              Shapeshaver! any news?

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by nonhog View Post
                                I know its old but its a good thread. Still not sure if I will pull the trigger on a LX9 swap but it still interests me.
                                Shapeshaver! any news?
                                No new news I'm afraid. I haven't done much to the sunbeam since that time. I had to move my business (where I was working on the car) so all the parts are in boxes in storage and the car is under a cover at the side of the house.

                                I have started working on it again now though.
                                1962 Sunbeam Alpine
                                www.lx9alpine.com
                                LX9 swap in progress

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X