I just was wondering if this had ever been done before. I've seen the 350 small block in a volvo, but never a 660. I was just thinking about it after I looked at some of the mg conversions and killerbv6.com and a few other site. that would make a for a nice boost from a 4 cylinder volvo engine and give more room for turbo?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
3100 in a RWD volvo?
Collapse
X
-
Eiether way, badass.
I'd still go TT genIII 660.
BTW what rear suspension do those cars have? (like the model in the first vid)
Comment
-
[quote="The_Raven"
BTW what rear suspension do those cars have? (like the model in the first vid)[/quote]
I know I'm late on this post....but Volvo 740's and other 700 series cars(except for the late model 760's) have solid rear axles.
Comment
-
[quote=mfewtrail]Ok more specicically the type of suspension is what I was asking about. I.E Trailing arm, leaf, canted 4 link.... etc.Originally posted by "The_Raven"
BTW what rear suspension do those cars have? (like the model in the first vid)[/quote
I know I'm late on this post....but Volvo 740's and other 700 series cars(except for the late model 760's) have solid rear axles.
I now know they use a trailing arm type suspension, the specifics I don't know though.
Comment
-
Sorry I didn't clarifyOriginally posted by The_Raven
Ok more specicically the type of suspension is what I was asking about. I.E Trailing arm, leaf, canted 4 link.... etc.
I now know they use a trailing arm type suspension, the specifics I don't know though.
. It's a trailing arm type suspension w/ torque rods, a panhard bar, and a coil spring/shock setup.
Comment
-
Cool, thank you.Originally posted by mfewtrailSorry I didn't clarifyOriginally posted by The_Raven
Ok more specicically the type of suspension is what I was asking about. I.E Trailing arm, leaf, canted 4 link.... etc.
I now know they use a trailing arm type suspension, the specifics I don't know though.
. It's a trailing arm type suspension w/ torque rods, a panhard bar, and a coil spring/shock setup.

SO #3 is a torque arm?
This would be a three link set-up? 1 torque arm and two lower control arms? FYI, the "panhard bar" is NOT part of how many "links" are in a particular design, as much as the mini trucking crowd would like to think so.
If that's the design it would be perfect. Though I am back burnering this project for a while.
I also have some messed up idea of my '98 Malibu AWD or RWD
Comment
-
#3 is considered a "subframe." #2 points to the torque rods, that picture isn't very clear in showing them though. I've got a '88 740 that I'm eventually going to V8 swap and make a street/strip car. I was talking about throwing my LQ1 crate engine in it at one time, but I've changed my mind.Originally posted by The_Raven
Cool, thank you.
SO #3 is a torque arm?
This would be a three link set-up? 1 torque arm and two lower control arms? FYI, the "panhard bar" is NOT part of how many "links" are in a particular design, as much as the mini trucking crowd would like to think so.
If that's the design it would be perfect. Though I am back burnering this project for a while.
I also have some messed up idea of my '98 Malibu AWD or RWD
Comment
-
Ok, but #3 has a bushing on the far end that allows the axle travel up and down around that fulcrum, correct?Originally posted by mfewtrail#3 is considered a "subframe." #2 points to the torque rods, that picture isn't very clear in showing them though. I've got a '88 740 that I'm eventually going to V8 swap and make a street/strip car. I was talking about throwing my LQ1 crate engine in it at one time, but I've changed my mind.Originally posted by The_Raven
Cool, thank you.
SO #3 is a torque arm?
This would be a three link set-up? 1 torque arm and two lower control arms? FYI, the "panhard bar" is NOT part of how many "links" are in a particular design, as much as the mini trucking crowd would like to think so.
If that's the design it would be perfect. Though I am back burnering this project for a while.
I also have some messed up idea of my '98 Malibu AWD or RWD

Comment


Comment