Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Injection Return Line

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Injection Return Line

    I was talking to a guy today, who for some reason was determined that he could take his 3.1 engine and block the outlet port on the rail, or alternatively lead it back into the filter where the low pressure pump delivered fuel and the high pressure pump picked it up (this is an engine swap into an MG, so not using an in tank pump).

    I told him that might create all sorts of havoc, but was unsure exactly why running an early style rail as a returnless system would be a disaster.

    Opinions?

  • #2
    most guys go the other way lol... They usually make the returnless into a return system.
    Shane "RedZMonte"
    2004 Corvette Z06 Commemorative Edition -VIRGIN
    1995 Monte Carlo Z34 14.38@101mph, 331hp/355tq
    -Turbonetics T04E Super 60 Turbo, 2.5" Borla Catback, OBDII, 42.5# Injectors
    2004 Subaru WRX STI -Lightly Modded (SOLD)
    1994 Lumina Z34 -VIRGIN (SOLD)
    1992 Lumina Z34-VIRGIN (RIP)
    1992 L67 Lumina Z34 (SOLD)
    1990 Turbo Grand Prix (SOLD)

    Comment


    • #3
      Well these are made up numbers of course - but if the high pressure pump is 100 PSI and the return goes to an FPR holding 50 PSI (the other 50 going to the return) and you impede the return by a low pressure pump at say 25 PSI, you will have effectively backed up the return and introduce extra pressure at the rail (in this hypothtical 25 PSI). That is of course assuming the low pressure pump doesn't fail pumping against a pressure double its own output, and of course that there is no such thing as friction or vacuum modulation of the FPR in effect.

      An FMU could do the same thing and probably last longer doing it.

      Comment

      Working...
      X