Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

stud upgrade for factory rockers

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • stud upgrade for factory rockers

    i would like to run some studs to replace the factory bolts, has anyone tried this to help prevent the rockers from pulling out of the head for high rpm??
    [SIGPIC]
    12.268@117... 11's to come!
    turbo 3400: 358whp and 365tq at 9 psi
    ASE Master Technician. GM Certified.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ibU1k8UZoo
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUqJyopd720

  • #2
    Drill and tap it for M10 bolts like the old heads had. If the bolt is just straight ripping the metal out of the heads then studs vs bolts wont make a difference.
    1993 EXT. CAB, 3.4L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. Sonoma
    1990 4Door, 3.2L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. 4X4. Trooper
    Because... I am, CANADIAN

    Comment


    • #3
      this may also be caused by over-torquin'....
      11.92 @ 122 MPH 3400 91 Cavalier Z24 Intercooled S/C. -totalled-
      10.56 @ 130 MPH 3900 LZ9 87 IROC Z28 Intercooled GT4088 Turbo

      Comment


      • #4
        I just use Loctite red and a prayer to the 60v6 gods.
        Past Builds;
        1991 Z24, 3500/5 Spd. 275WHP/259WTQ 13.07@108 MPH
        1989 Camaro RS, ITB-3500/700R4. 263WHP/263WTQ 13.52@99.2 MPH
        Current Project;
        1972 Nova 12.73@105.7 MPH

        Comment


        • #5
          I've had my rockers on and off 5 times now, no problems-yet, how ever I am following the torque specs to a T with the torque wheel, And you can positively feel where the fastener is at its limits right when you get to 28-30*

          Its runs!!!>>>Aint No 60* Sound Like Mehttp://youtu.be/YKEmNwa141U

          Comment


          • #6
            guys that isnt the point. ive seen a few 10mm and 8mm rockers pull out of heads under daily conditions. i just want to ensure i wont at 8000 maybe higher rpms. torquing the rockers inst an issue, i trust my snap on tech-wrench. wanted an opinion on a stud versus a traditional bolt. im pretty sure i have it solved by drilling to a 10mm, with a stud.
            [SIGPIC]
            12.268@117... 11's to come!
            turbo 3400: 358whp and 365tq at 9 psi
            ASE Master Technician. GM Certified.
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ibU1k8UZoo
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUqJyopd720

            Comment


            • #7
              is the fastener stripping or the head?

              Its runs!!!>>>Aint No 60* Sound Like Mehttp://youtu.be/YKEmNwa141U

              Comment


              • #8
                Are you having issues with the bolts loosening up or are you just afraid they will at high RPM?

                If the former you may have some thread issues in the heads (I'm assuming they are aluminum??). If that is the case there are a few fixes.

                In the case of the later (which I am dealing with on my build as well) the issue is concern for seating forces.

                On Genn III and later heads (to my knowledge) the rockers contain a square looking, boss that is part of the rocker/bolt assembly. This is intended to help reduce stress on the bolt. It primarily helps with the back and forth bending force applied to the bolt and aids in eliminating some of the tendancy for the bolt holes to elongate under extreme wear.

                To my knowledge I have never personally seen or heard of a stock engine with an issue where the bolt hole was elongated or pulled out (anyone else have any input on that?).

                The 'easiest' way to assure the rockers you have will run to higher RPM without bolt failure is to carefully examine the following options:

                1) Drill the thread longer (may be tough, or weaken the head depending on where and how you drill).
                2) Use the GM square pedistals or similar when possible (making their base larger may help depending on whether there is room or a spot face on the head that accomodates larger than stock).
                3) Consider using a threaded insert. This option increases the shear stress area and thus available force on the bolt. However you could weaken the surrounding metal.


                The last more expensive option (assuming you area already running aftermarket rockers) is to make a girdle for them... not sure how easy or good this will be... but I'm looking into it for my build....

                Anyone else have any additional comments?

                Comment


                • #9
                  - stock 3400 = bottom M10 , top M10

                  - aftermarket roller rockers = bottom M10 , top 3/8

                  - my project = bottom 7/16 , top 3/8 (ARP)

                  I am updating my rocker arm studs to longer ones .
                  Because probably need longer valve springs and therefore longer valves.
                  Have to drill the hole in the head larger and put a helicoil insert.
                  I can not do the job in my garage , my friend is doing that job.
                  That is why no pictures yet.
                  Most difficult is to drill the new larger hole downright.

                  There is not much material round the hole.
                  The helicoil insert makes it stronger , but it can still break down , because the aluminum
                  fall to pieces.

                  I understund there is not problem with the studs in normal usage.
                  But when you have high revving engine with heavy valve spring loads, that is
                  when this maybe an issue.

                  I am working on a stud girdle also.
                  That is not brought to the desired final state yet.



                  Last edited by veekuusi; 01-14-2012, 09:38 AM.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Well, if/when my 8mm rocker arms fail when spinning the motor to 7000rpm with PAC 1518 springs and a WOT Race cam, I'll let you know.

                    A few numbers:

                    At a 1.76" install height, the PAC 1518 spring has a spring pressure of 142.53#.
                    At maximum intake valve lift of .570", the spring pressure is 321.13#.
                    At maximum exhaust valve lift of .555", the spring pressure is 318#.

                    That makes the PAC 1518 a bit stiffer than Superdave's Comp 26915 springs.
                    So basically I'm in the same boat praying to the 660 gods.
                    Last edited by mfuller; 01-14-2012, 12:07 PM.
                    Matt
                    2000 Oldsmobile Alero GLS sedan
                    3400/3500 hybrid, Diamond Racing forged pistons, Scat I-beams, TCE DRTC, ported heads, WOT Race cam, PAC 1518s, Manley valves, F40 6-speed with Quaife LSD

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I've always thought about building a stud girdle but with the limited space it might be a major pain.
                      Past Builds;
                      1991 Z24, 3500/5 Spd. 275WHP/259WTQ 13.07@108 MPH
                      1989 Camaro RS, ITB-3500/700R4. 263WHP/263WTQ 13.52@99.2 MPH
                      Current Project;
                      1972 Nova 12.73@105.7 MPH

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        if you intigrated it into the stock valve cover...no it wouldnt

                        Its runs!!!>>>Aint No 60* Sound Like Mehttp://youtu.be/YKEmNwa141U

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Hmmm I've often thought that same thing.

                          Is anyone seriously interested in this? I've been toying with the idea for a while. I could create a 3D CAD model and have it rapid cast into new valve covers. I have no idea exact costs, but if anyone was interested in pursuing it and serious about it I wouldn't mind investing the time to make the CAD models to give to the pattern shop for casting or forging..... (gears are now turning rapidly...)

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by bob442 View Post
                            if you intigrated it into the stock valve cover...no it wouldnt
                            I think the intake clearance is too tight IIRC.
                            "I am not what you so glibly call to be a civilized man. I have broken with society for reasons which I alone am able to appreciate. I am therefore not subject to it's stupid laws, and I ask you to never allude to them in my presence again."

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by veekuusi View Post
                              Most difficult is to drill the new larger hole downright.
                              ]
                              probably want to use a drill press for that. should be able to get one those vise attachments for a drill press to hold the head.
                              sigpic
                              99 Grand Am GT
                              3400/3500 -Solid trans mount--TCE 65mm T-body---85mm LS2 maf---1 1/4' TCE intake spacers with 3400 upper--SLP Catback with flowmaster 80--TOG headers
                              Modded 3400 lifters with LT1 springs---Comp Cams 26986 Springs
                              1357 cam 227 233 .050 dur
                              515 515 lift 112 lsa
                              15.232@88.85mph on stock 3400---New time to come


                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X