Iron head and intake porting

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Canyonero
    Plays with Volvos now.
    • Sep 2006
    • 1112

    #1

    Iron head and intake porting

    Would someone with experience be willing to port a set of iron heads and a TBI intake? This would be for a 3.1L conversion or a 3.4L swap into a 2.8L equipped Isuzu Trooper using the stock fuel injection.

    How much would you charge for such a service?
    '98 Volvo V90 - Ford 5.0 swap in progress
    '96 LR Range Rover 4.6 HSE - suspiciously reliable
    '92 Volvo 740 Wagon - former parts car, now daily-driver beater
    '71 Opel Kadett Wagon - 1.9L CIH w/ Weber DGV 32/36, in bits
  • Guest

    #2
    I have a set of iron heads here that were ported out I guess you could say. Its a rough job. Not done by me. Gasket matched and ported on intakes and gasket matched and some porting on the exh. I can send pics. They were on my iron head 3.4 that made 150 whp through a stock intake and 52mm tb.

    Good condition. I wouldnt' mind only getting $50 for them, plus actual shipping.

    Comment

    • Canyonero
      Plays with Volvos now.
      • Sep 2006
      • 1112

      #3
      Yeah, I wouldn't mind seein' some pics. Wanna post them here or just email?
      '98 Volvo V90 - Ford 5.0 swap in progress
      '96 LR Range Rover 4.6 HSE - suspiciously reliable
      '92 Volvo 740 Wagon - former parts car, now daily-driver beater
      '71 Opel Kadett Wagon - 1.9L CIH w/ Weber DGV 32/36, in bits

      Comment

      • Guest

        #4
        I can try to get some posted up here. THey are assembled, crane everything. Roughly 11k miles on the heads and parts.

        Comment

        • torq455
          If I only had money!!!
          • Dec 2003
          • 1615

          #5
          I'm sure Ben can do that.
          Andy

          sigpic

          fastest 1/8: 10.19@ 67.17
          fastest 1/4: 16.16@ 82.70

          62mm TB, 1.6 roller tip rockers, Ostrich 2.0, UD pulley, TB heater bypass, K&N, 180* stat, No cat, 99Grand AM dual cooling fans. 4T65E swap FDR 3.69, EP LSD, F.A.S.T. transmission controller, TransGo shift kit.

          Comment

          • Canyonero
            Plays with Volvos now.
            • Sep 2006
            • 1112

            #6
            I'm sure a lot of people CAN. But who WANTS to?

            I have some junk heads here I could practice on, but I could be doing more harm than good if I don't have the right technique.
            '98 Volvo V90 - Ford 5.0 swap in progress
            '96 LR Range Rover 4.6 HSE - suspiciously reliable
            '92 Volvo 740 Wagon - former parts car, now daily-driver beater
            '71 Opel Kadett Wagon - 1.9L CIH w/ Weber DGV 32/36, in bits

            Comment

            • 3400CaMaRo
              • Jul 2008
              • 12

              #7
              any advice about the hump in the intake runners of the 3.4 camaro heads

              Comment

              • fudge
                Banned
                • Aug 2008
                • 4

                #8
                I have seen a turbo car somewhere it was a cavalier that ported the heads and removed the hump. Papers say it loses flow but it probably depends on what application its going to be used in. A boosted motor might make more power with it removed. It doesn't hurt I would suppose to grind them down a bit.

                Comment

                • 2.8RS
                  Cone Murdurer
                  • Jan 2007
                  • 196

                  #9
                  Shaving down the hump on a boosted motor is fine but on an NA motor you want to keep it. You can smooth it out a but but don't take a while lot of that away, it improves flow.
                  00 Grand Prix GTP Daytona

                  Comment

                  • 3400CaMaRo
                    • Jul 2008
                    • 12

                    #10
                    the only thing i dont get about the is that if it improves flow why isnt it in more heads my personal opnion about the hump is that its there to mix the A/F charge for better emissions i think its the reason 3.4 dies out at around 4500 rpms im going to keep some of it for maybe lower rpm flow

                    Comment

                    • 2.8RS
                      Cone Murdurer
                      • Jan 2007
                      • 196

                      #11
                      Originally posted by 3400CaMaRo View Post
                      the only thing i dont get about the is that if it improves flow why isnt it in more heads my personal opnion about the hump is that its there to mix the A/F charge for better emissions i think its the reason 3.4 dies out at around 4500 rpms im going to keep some of it for maybe lower rpm flow
                      The iron heads are just a poor design, that's why they die out in the upper RPMs. The aluminum heads are much better and are a much differnet design.
                      00 Grand Prix GTP Daytona

                      Comment

                      • 3400CaMaRo
                        • Jul 2008
                        • 12

                        #12
                        well i finished porting mine today no shark fin at all they flowed 127cfm at .450" lift on the intake and 112cfm at .450" on the exhaust i wasnt able bench them before the port so if anyone knows what they flow stock that would be nice they peaked flow wise at .450" then they started to flow less above .450"

                        Comment

                        Working...