Dizzy vs. DIS

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Canyonero
    Plays with Volvos now.
    • Sep 2006
    • 1112

    #1

    Dizzy vs. DIS

    I've been running DIS on my Trooper since the swap, but now that I'm going to the 3.1L intake and hope to get my A/C reinstalled, I have nowhere to mount my coil packs! I think it would be a simpler option to install a distributor rather than fabricate a bracket for the coil packs, but what are the downsides (aside from adding some wear parts back into the system)?
    '98 Volvo V90 - Ford 5.0 swap in progress
    '96 LR Range Rover 4.6 HSE - suspiciously reliable
    '92 Volvo 740 Wagon - former parts car, now daily-driver beater
    '71 Opel Kadett Wagon - 1.9L CIH w/ Weber DGV 32/36, in bits
  • Superdave
    Been there, Built that.
    • Sep 2004
    • 5850

    #2
    I'd grab a DIS bracket from a 3400.. you should be able to mount that just about anywhere.
    Past Builds;
    1991 Z24, 3500/5 Spd. 275WHP/259WTQ 13.07@108 MPH
    1989 Camaro RS, ITB-3500/700R4. 263WHP/263WTQ 13.52@99.2 MPH
    Current Project;
    1972 Nova 12.73@105.7 MPH

    Comment

    • Canyonero
      Plays with Volvos now.
      • Sep 2006
      • 1112

      #3
      I actually have one of those around here somewhere... along with a whole 3400 top end and pistons (might get around to that hybrid project someday). I'll take a look.

      But the question at hand: Will I lose anything by installing a dizzy instead? Still the cleanest option I think.
      '98 Volvo V90 - Ford 5.0 swap in progress
      '96 LR Range Rover 4.6 HSE - suspiciously reliable
      '92 Volvo 740 Wagon - former parts car, now daily-driver beater
      '71 Opel Kadett Wagon - 1.9L CIH w/ Weber DGV 32/36, in bits

      Comment

      • Superdave
        Been there, Built that.
        • Sep 2004
        • 5850

        #4
        weaker spark is a big one.. why go to the 3.1 intake?
        Past Builds;
        1991 Z24, 3500/5 Spd. 275WHP/259WTQ 13.07@108 MPH
        1989 Camaro RS, ITB-3500/700R4. 263WHP/263WTQ 13.52@99.2 MPH
        Current Project;
        1972 Nova 12.73@105.7 MPH

        Comment

        • Canyonero
          Plays with Volvos now.
          • Sep 2006
          • 1112

          #5
          Fits better, flows better, ability to change accessory brackets so I can get the battery back in the engine bay and possibly reinstall A/C.
          '98 Volvo V90 - Ford 5.0 swap in progress
          '96 LR Range Rover 4.6 HSE - suspiciously reliable
          '92 Volvo 740 Wagon - former parts car, now daily-driver beater
          '71 Opel Kadett Wagon - 1.9L CIH w/ Weber DGV 32/36, in bits

          Comment

          Working...