GM or Fel-pro intake manifold gaskets on a 3.4?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ssdurango
    • Dec 2004
    • 170

    #1

    GM or Fel-pro intake manifold gaskets on a 3.4?

    Which intake manifold gaskets do you guys think are better...GM or felpro or other. I'm working on a 95 camaro 3.4. supercharged.

    Thanks for your input.
  • dmax
    • Mar 2010
    • 4

    #2
    i have had great results with felpro, but other people say GM, id say ether would be fine

    Comment

    • 86FieroSEv6
      • Feb 2010
      • 527

      #3
      In my experience, the Fel Pro sets seem to last the longest. Just be super duper attentive to your torque down.

      If you ain't rock and roll, you must be driving a Honda

      Comment

      • Tbay99Venture
        Push-starting the old way
        • Mar 2010
        • 123

        #4
        Bolts

        I bought a kit from GM the first time I had to do this. It came with bolts and the long ones were pre-coated with thread lock. Recently I had to put new head gaskets on. The GM gasket seemed A-OK when I pulled the LIM, I'd guess that was about 65,000 miles or so of use. The head gasket set from FelPro didn't have bolts so I cleaned the existing ones up and put on some locktite. I've read a few different places where that's recommended. (Don't forget to chase the threads on the block before putting it back together.)

        Comment

        • dmax
          • Mar 2010
          • 4

          #5
          make sure to torque the bolts in the right order step by step

          Comment

          • geoffinbc
            Iron Head Enthusiast
            • Oct 2003
            • 5831

            #6
            Its iron head. No difference. Keep everything de greased with brake clean, proper bolt torque and DO NOT EVER CUT the gasket to fit past the pushrods and you will be fine.
            1993 EXT. CAB, 3.4L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. Sonoma
            1990 4Door, 3.2L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. 4X4. Trooper
            Because... I am, CANADIAN

            Comment

            • ssdurango
              • Dec 2004
              • 170

              #7
              Is the lower intake suppost to be studded down. Because I have all bolts now, but I seem to remember my old 2.8 had studs...Any one know?

              Comment

              • geoffinbc
                Iron Head Enthusiast
                • Oct 2003
                • 5831

                #8
                Usually 3 studs and 2 bolts per side.
                1993 EXT. CAB, 3.4L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. Sonoma
                1990 4Door, 3.2L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. 4X4. Trooper
                Because... I am, CANADIAN

                Comment

                • ssdurango
                  • Dec 2004
                  • 170

                  #9
                  Weird! thanks again man. Do you think it would be a good idea to stud it all the way around? And use lock washers?

                  Comment

                  • geoffinbc
                    Iron Head Enthusiast
                    • Oct 2003
                    • 5831

                    #10
                    I would stick with the stock setup it makes assembly and dis assembly easier. I would never use lock washers on something that has a critical torque spec like the intake manifold. Just use a little assembly on the threads and under the head of the bolts and nuts
                    1993 EXT. CAB, 3.4L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. Sonoma
                    1990 4Door, 3.2L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. 4X4. Trooper
                    Because... I am, CANADIAN

                    Comment

                    Working...