Compression Ratio??

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • G-U-NOT
    Banned
    • Jan 2006
    • 158

    #1

    Compression Ratio??

    Ok, so I did a compression test on my 3.1 today because I was curious to see what its at now that I rebuilt the engine with thinner head gaskets, plus it looed like someone already had the heads milled down!!
    All cylinders were between 175 psi and 180 psi....
    Does anyone know what that is in ratio form??
  • bszopi
    Site Coder
    • Apr 2000
    • 9185

    #2
    There is no way to convert dynamic compression to static compression.
    -Brad-
    89 Mustang : Future 60V6 Power

    Follow the build -> http://www.3x00swap.com/index.php?page=mustang-blog

    Comment

    • G-U-NOT
      Banned
      • Jan 2006
      • 158

      #3
      So how do I figure out what the ratio is then??

      Comment

      • bszopi
        Site Coder
        • Apr 2000
        • 9185

        #4
        You'd have to measure everything. Most of it could use stock values, but since you think the heads have been milled, you'd have to actually CC them.
        -Brad-
        89 Mustang : Future 60V6 Power

        Follow the build -> http://www.3x00swap.com/index.php?page=mustang-blog

        Comment

        • G-U-NOT
          Banned
          • Jan 2006
          • 158

          #5
          Well Im not positive about the heads... thats just what they looked like when I had them off to sandblasted them!

          Lets just say that the combustion cambers are still the factory size....
          I used head gaskets from a 3.1L Camaro, which are .020" thinner than my stock ones! What would my CR be then??

          Comment

          • bszopi
            Site Coder
            • Apr 2000
            • 9185

            #6
            http://60degreev6.com/CR_Calculator
            -Brad-
            89 Mustang : Future 60V6 Power

            Follow the build -> http://www.3x00swap.com/index.php?page=mustang-blog

            Comment

            • ForcedFirebird
              Live life 3.7mi at a time
              • Jan 2007
              • 4555

              #7
              Originally posted by G-U-NOT View Post
              Well Im not positive about the heads... thats just what they looked like when I had them off to sandblasted them!

              Lets just say that the combustion cambers are still the factory size....
              I used head gaskets from a 3.1L Camaro, which are .020" thinner than my stock ones! What would my CR be then??

              You are crazy for using the RWD gaskets. The pistons protrude .020" out of the block and the RWD gaskets are only .040" thick. This gives you a quanch of a mere .020" and probably will have piston contact in higher RPM's. Ask SuperDave.
              Links:
              WOT-Tech.com
              FaceBook
              Instagram

              Comment

              • G-U-NOT
                Banned
                • Jan 2006
                • 158

                #8
                Nah its fine.
                I've aready had it up to 5k and no problems so far!!
                Runs good, sounds good....

                Comment

                • ForcedFirebird
                  Live life 3.7mi at a time
                  • Jan 2007
                  • 4555

                  #9
                  Originally posted by G-U-NOT View Post
                  Nah its fine.
                  I've aready had it up to 5k and no problems so far!!
                  Runs good, sounds good....

                  You won't know until you take it apart, or chip a pston/bend a valve.


                  http://60degreev6.com/forum/showthre...piston+contact
                  Last edited by ForcedFirebird; 03-09-2008, 08:51 AM.
                  Links:
                  WOT-Tech.com
                  FaceBook
                  Instagram

                  Comment

                  • johnnymossville
                    • Jul 2007
                    • 255

                    #10
                    Are you running a 3.1 or a 3100? If you are running a 3.1 and using the iron head gaskets your CR should be around 9.37:1. You may not have valve to piston clearance problems, but like ForcedFirebird says you really won't know until you take it apart or over rev it and something very bad happens. I agree with Forced also on the fact that your quench values will be less than ideal.
                    Last edited by johnnymossville; 03-09-2008, 12:13 PM.

                    Comment

                    • Superdave
                      Been there, Built that.
                      • Sep 2004
                      • 5850

                      #11
                      Gen2 pistons don't pop out of the block, the .040" Camaro gaskets are fine... esp with a stock cam.


                      All heads have that milled look.. because they were surfaced at the factory
                      Past Builds;
                      1991 Z24, 3500/5 Spd. 275WHP/259WTQ 13.07@108 MPH
                      1989 Camaro RS, ITB-3500/700R4. 263WHP/263WTQ 13.52@99.2 MPH
                      Current Project;
                      1972 Nova 12.73@105.7 MPH

                      Comment

                      • ForcedFirebird
                        Live life 3.7mi at a time
                        • Jan 2007
                        • 4555

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Superdave View Post
                        Gen2 pistons don't pop out of the block, the .040" Camaro gaskets are fine... esp with a stock cam.


                        All heads have that milled look.. because they were surfaced at the factory

                        DOH, wasn't thinking he had a Gen2 :P
                        Links:
                        WOT-Tech.com
                        FaceBook
                        Instagram

                        Comment

                        • tetnus shot racing
                          • Apr 2008
                          • 2

                          #13
                          I'd like to add a question to this post... I have the Gen 2 3.1 also. Is the amount of dish in the stock piston necessary? I'm looking to increase compression, and that much of a dish seems foolish. My engine as of right now is completely stock, and I'm doing a complete overhaul... I haven't checked the "factory" or "stock" valve to piston clearance, but I was hoping to use flat top pistons with valve reliefs for clearance. I'm sure that the change would lead to substantial compression increase, right? Too much compression for alum heads? Does any of the hi-perf piston manufacturers already make something for this?

                          Any help would be appreciated. I've been trying to figure these questions out for a while...

                          Comment

                          • Superdave
                            Been there, Built that.
                            • Sep 2004
                            • 5850

                            #14
                            Originally posted by tetnus shot racing View Post
                            I'd like to add a question to this post... I have the Gen 2 3.1 also. Is the amount of dish in the stock piston necessary? I'm looking to increase compression, and that much of a dish seems foolish. My engine as of right now is completely stock, and I'm doing a complete overhaul... I haven't checked the "factory" or "stock" valve to piston clearance, but I was hoping to use flat top pistons with valve reliefs for clearance. I'm sure that the change would lead to substantial compression increase, right? Too much compression for alum heads? Does any of the hi-perf piston manufacturers already make something for this?

                            Any help would be appreciated. I've been trying to figure these questions out for a while...
                            you can use the 3.1 Camaro pistons, they're basically flat tops (12cc dish). they bring the compression up to 11:1
                            Past Builds;
                            1991 Z24, 3500/5 Spd. 275WHP/259WTQ 13.07@108 MPH
                            1989 Camaro RS, ITB-3500/700R4. 263WHP/263WTQ 13.52@99.2 MPH
                            Current Project;
                            1972 Nova 12.73@105.7 MPH

                            Comment

                            • torq455
                              If I only had money!!!
                              • Dec 2003
                              • 1615

                              #15
                              http://60degreev6.com/CR_Calculator
                              Andy

                              sigpic

                              fastest 1/8: 10.19@ 67.17
                              fastest 1/4: 16.16@ 82.70

                              62mm TB, 1.6 roller tip rockers, Ostrich 2.0, UD pulley, TB heater bypass, K&N, 180* stat, No cat, 99Grand AM dual cooling fans. 4T65E swap FDR 3.69, EP LSD, F.A.S.T. transmission controller, TransGo shift kit.

                              Comment

                              Working...