Originally posted by DirtRacer
View Post
Need HP on a 3.1 FWD..!!!
Collapse
X
-
you'd need a 3100 to do the 2.8 piston swap "2800" the 3.1 and 2.8 share the same bore but the 2.8 has a slightly shorter stroke.
-
3400 block, 2.8 crank, whichever rods work(help me out here Dave lol) and 3.4L RWD pistons. oh and race gas for that high compression
IIRC that will still leave you at around 3.1L for displacement, but it'll liek to rev high

Cammed 3400 --> 224whp 210wtq
Cammed 3500 --> ???
1 of 5 3500 J-Bodies
Comment
-
lol.. you'd probably need custom pistons to get any kind of respectable compression. When spring rolls around we should go junkyarding and collect up a bunch of random stuff..Originally posted by RedBird View Post3400 block, 2.8 crank, whichever rods work(help me out here Dave lol) and 3.4L RWD pistons. oh and race gas for that high compression
IIRC that will still leave you at around 3.1L for displacement, but it'll liek to rev high
Comment
-
right, but the 2.8 crank drops the piston in the cyl like 8mm so you need a taller piston to make up for that difference.Originally posted by RedBird View Posti thought that 3.4 RWD pistons gave you crazy compression, like 12.5:1? hell i remember you saying it before......
Comment
-
it doesn't work like that, they're not looking for an "oily", high mileage engine, they're looking for one that looks period correct and if you know anything at all about gm over the past 10 years its not hard to tell that a newer 3x00 plenum is not period correct for his carOriginally posted by Tdunk View Postdefine old better..... if he got a 3100 with alot of miles then how would they know the real difference? The 3100's still have a 3100 on the UIM and he could just ask ben to have a 3100 UIM without the SFI on it. If he wants it to look old then get an engine with plenty of miles on it and clean the interior of the engine up a bit to free up any HP losses from the age.... I dont see any problem with this? Srry about rwd i mis intrepreted what he origionally wanted.
Comment

Comment