I have a 91 z24. The book shows that the 91 year 3.1 has a good bit lest power and torque than the 92-94 years. What gives? Is it the ECM or cams or something else?
-
-
i thought they were the same.Andy
sigpic
fastest 1/8: 10.19@ 67.17
fastest 1/4: 16.16@ 82.70
62mm TB, 1.6 roller tip rockers, Ostrich 2.0, UD pulley, TB heater bypass, K&N, 180* stat, No cat, 99Grand AM dual cooling fans. 4T65E swap FDR 3.69, EP LSD, F.A.S.T. transmission controller, TransGo shift kit.
-
The book I have shows a big differance in torque. I think it was 30 lbs. Don't have it in front of me. It's up there. Just the 1st year 1991 3.1. I was wondering what they changed.Comment
-
uh, no, from 91 to 92 tq went from 180 to 185ft/lbs. It's in the computer tuning.
Cammed 3400 --> 224whp 210wtq
Cammed 3500 --> ???
1 of 5 3500 J-BodiesComment
-
Yep, GM fiddled with something in there. engines are internally the same.Originally posted by RedBird View Post
Comment
Comment