Lightweight Starters?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BillS
    • Oct 2005
    • 132

    #1

    Lightweight Starters?

    RWD applications use an old tech heavy starter while the transverse engines use a smaller lighter and supposedly more powerful starter.

    Unfortunately not interchangeable as they bolt on opposite sides of the block.

    Anyone know of a RWD substitute starter in the FWD style?
  • cmbtengnr
    • Oct 2005
    • 4

    #2
    okay maybe I'll just sound like a moron.. but won't an SBC lightweight race starter work for 60 degree v6s ... FWD or RWD if you buy the ones with the adjustanble solenoid offset?

    Comment

    • BillS
      • Oct 2005
      • 132

      #3
      Originally posted by cmbtengnr
      okay maybe I'll just sound like a moron.. but won't an SBC lightweight race starter work for 60 degree v6s ... FWD or RWD if you buy the ones with the adjustanble solenoid offset?
      That's exactly what I am wondering.

      Maybe the same as the 90 deg. V6 as well?

      Comment

      • MidnightriderZ24
        • Jan 2005
        • 699

        #4
        u know the funny thing about this q? yesterday at work (autozone) some1 purchased a new starter for their 01 GAGT, and it was made wrong, it looked like it would mount on the other side of the block, perfect for RWD LOL.
        [SIGPIC]
        12.268@117... 11's to come!
        turbo 3400: 358whp and 365tq at 9 psi
        ASE Master Technician. GM Certified.
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ibU1k8UZoo
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUqJyopd720

        Comment

        • Syn
          The Master Piece
          • Oct 2005
          • 599

          #5
          i believe their called gear reduction high torque starters, but people were saying they don't have them on the newer 660's there just different from the older ones
          sigpic

          1993 Cavalier Z24, 3.1/3400 hybrid, crane 272 cam, LS6 springs,port and polish,2.5 exhaust to 80 series flowmaster,solid mounts

          Comment

          • BillS
            • Oct 2005
            • 132

            #6
            I spent the time going through the catalogues and comparing starters.

            There is a lightweight high torque starter used in some of the vans and even on the 454 trucks that should sub for the Camaro - half the weight and it will spin a big block - what's not to like?

            Comment

            • TurboZ24
              • Dec 2003
              • 299

              #7
              Did you check the 3800 camaro's and see if the starter is on the correct side, like the 3.4 camaro one?
              Curtis
              91\' Turbo Z24
              http://www.turboz24.com

              Comment

              • geoffinbc
                Iron Head Enthusiast
                • Oct 2003
                • 5831

                #8
                All the 660 RWD starters are big. My donor 3.4L came from a 95 which was the last year for RWD and it was identical to my S-10
                1993 EXT. CAB, 3.4L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. Sonoma
                1990 4Door, 3.2L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. 4X4. Trooper
                Because... I am, CANADIAN

                Comment

                • BillS
                  • Oct 2005
                  • 132

                  #9
                  Originally posted by betterthanyou
                  All the 660 RWD starters are big. My donor 3.4L came from a 95 which was the last year for RWD and it was identical to my S-10
                  Yes, but there are other later starters that are not big and that do fit the 3.4.

                  Comment

                  • geoffinbc
                    Iron Head Enthusiast
                    • Oct 2003
                    • 5831

                    #10
                    Right, but not off a RWD 60*V6
                    1993 EXT. CAB, 3.4L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. Sonoma
                    1990 4Door, 3.2L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. 4X4. Trooper
                    Because... I am, CANADIAN

                    Comment

                    • BillS
                      • Oct 2005
                      • 132

                      #11
                      Originally posted by betterthanyou
                      Right, but not off a RWD 60*V6
                      Yes, that's what I meant when I said 'other' starters.

                      They were used on 90 deg. V6 and V8 applications but fit V6-60

                      Comment

                      • geoffinbc
                        Iron Head Enthusiast
                        • Oct 2003
                        • 5831

                        #12
                        Indeed. One thing I do know is that the bolt holes on SBC starters are SAE and 660 ones are metric and slightly larger. So you will have to drill out the holes a tiny bit.
                        1993 EXT. CAB, 3.4L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. Sonoma
                        1990 4Door, 3.2L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. 4X4. Trooper
                        Because... I am, CANADIAN

                        Comment

                        Working...