Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

pushing the evelope of the 3500

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Nightingale
    replied
    Lol I was gonna say those numbers weren't adding up....pistons would be sticking out almost a quarter inch above the deck lol.

    Leave a comment:


  • ForcedFirebird
    replied
    Man, we are serious here :P

    I'm not kidding when I tell you John and I have been on the phone literally for hours planning this build since about November.

    Don't mess with us like that

    Leave a comment:


  • Keoki1978
    replied
    It was all just a BS thing, I'd love to build a stroker 3500 to a 3700 with titanium rods, billet steel crank. I didnt do the math but your right, I couldnt use 5.850 length rods with a 1.460 comp height and a 3.504 inch stroke. But I suppose I'd be able to use a 6 inch rod with a 1.154 comp height pistons. Anyway, I'm in tampa area by the airport, or town n country area for those that know the area..

    Leave a comment:


  • ForcedFirebird
    replied
    keoki, where in Tampa are you? I'm up in Bradenton a few times a year and would like to check out both yours and Joseph's cars

    Leave a comment:


  • Driver_10
    replied
    I got goose-bumps reading your description. (wouldnt mind trading engines with ya for a day.)

    However, you stated the were you able to use 5.850 rod with a stroke increase of .194. With a compression height of 1.460, I will have to de-stroke the crank to enable the use of 5.850 rods and a .070 gasket.

    Also, Id love to see some pics of your intake, billet girdle, oil-squirter mounting and whatever other pics you have. I could use more "fodder" for my own ideas. (Its cool to see these engines being developed)

    Leave a comment:


  • sprucegagt
    replied
    Originally posted by ForcedFirebird View Post
    By offset grinding the crank rod pin .064". Since the crank pin is 2.249" and his rod big end is 2.1", there SHOULD be enough room.

    We have spent many nights on the phone coming up with what will work, since he already had the pistons, copper gaskets and knew the rods available.
    Doh! For some reason I was thinking the offset cut would me more than that.

    Leave a comment:


  • ForcedFirebird
    replied
    Originally posted by sprucegagt View Post
    How are you coming up with a total destroke of .128"?
    By offset grinding the crank rod pin .064". Since the crank pin is 2.249" and his rod big end is 2.1", there SHOULD be enough room.

    We have spent many nights on the phone coming up with what will work, since he already had the pistons, copper gaskets and knew the rods available.

    Leave a comment:


  • Keoki1978
    replied
    Block Standard Bore (3.700)
    Stroked out .194" (from 3.31 to 3.504)
    crank pin diam. 2.100 (uses Cunningham Titanium Rods)
    connecting rod 5.850 (original 5.900)
    comp hiegth 1.4600
    piston to deck +.030"
    head-gasket thk .070"-.071" crushed (annealed copper style)
    CR 9.6:1 apprx.
    3500 steel crank replaced with billet steel knife-edged and lightened
    (installing oil-squirters on all cyl)
    dry sump oil system
    total displacement- (226 C.I.) true 3.7L

    Parts list

    Sheet metal intake
    CNC ported LX9 heads with "Manley" Titanium valves and comp cams #122 springs and steel retainers
    Wottech 65mm TB w/ adapter
    forged "Venolia" pistons
    Cunningham 5.850 "Titanium" I-beam rods (bushed) .927 piston pin & 2.225 crnk-pin bore
    Turbonetics 60-1 turbo
    JAZ 50mm ss WG
    Synchronic BOV
    Electromotive Tec 3 engine management system
    7lb fidanza aluminum flywheel.
    Billet main gridle with ARP hardware

    (Final Combo built for 8500rpm max shift-point w/ absolute 9000rpm red-line)

    X-trax 6 speed sequential shift tranny
    X-trax 12-bolt rear-end w/ 3.42 gears and all the "fixins"

    The answer is, this motor survive the rated 750hp at the tires without stretching mains or studs.

    Id love some feedback.

    Leave a comment:


  • sprucegagt
    replied
    How are you coming up with a total destroke of .128"?

    Leave a comment:


  • Superdave
    replied
    Originally posted by ForcedFirebird View Post
    Ummm, wasn't that a gen 1 block? Could have sworn it was a 3.4....
    same difference.. internally atleast.

    Leave a comment:


  • ForcedFirebird
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • ForcedFirebird
    replied
    Originally posted by Superdave View Post
    he was running a gen2 block so no cross-bolts.
    Ummm, wasn't that a gen 1 block? Could have sworn it was a 3.4....

    Leave a comment:


  • Driver_10
    replied
    Originally posted by Superdave View Post
    he was running a gen2 block so no cross-bolts.
    Oooooo! Thats good to know! I should surely be able to 550 to the wheels.

    Leave a comment:


  • Superdave
    replied
    Originally posted by Driver_10 View Post
    I certainly hope so.

    I wouldnt normally have my doubts, untill I read a thread some time ago about a guy with 3.1l, 465 rwhp'd chevette that had stretched mains. Im not sure if that was the crossed bolted block or not. He never specified.
    he was running a gen2 block so no cross-bolts.

    Leave a comment:


  • ForcedFirebird
    replied
    It just makes me sad, knowing I sold you bits and pcs of a motor and it will probably run before mine

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X