Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

roller lifters with 2.8

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ericjon262
    replied
    yeah, just a little...

    Leave a comment:


  • pocket-rocket
    replied
    Originally posted by ericjon262 View Post
    Rocker studs, not main studs.
    Wee bit difference, huh? Lol

    Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2

    Leave a comment:


  • ericjon262
    replied
    Originally posted by pocket-rocket View Post
    You could always use a windage tray from a DOHC or 3x00. Drops right in but it probably won't be as strong as a true stud girdle.

    Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2

    Rocker studs, not main studs.

    Leave a comment:


  • pocket-rocket
    replied
    You could always use a windage tray from a DOHC or 3x00. Drops right in but it probably won't be as strong as a true stud girdle.

    Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2

    Leave a comment:


  • veekuusi
    replied
    Originally posted by ericjon262 View Post
    did you stud girdle fit? i never saw pictures of it.
    I decided to start the engine without stud girdle.
    I have not forgotten it , but hope the engine will survive first run without it.

    Most important is to get the engine running.
    I have more time and money for it coming winter.

    Leave a comment:


  • ericjon262
    replied
    did you stud girdle fit? i never saw pictures of it.

    Leave a comment:


  • veekuusi
    replied
    Possibility to measure exhaust gas temperature in dyno session.
    1/8 NPT thread









    Leave a comment:


  • veekuusi
    replied
    A few new pictures.





    Last edited by veekuusi; 08-28-2012, 06:00 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • veekuusi
    replied
    This is a one year anniversary post to this thread.
    One year and a week ago my friend suggested to install a
    60 degree chevrolet engine to my race car.Because I had trouble with the old Ford engine.
    He had seen a pair of 3400 heads , and realized the potential.
    I had never ever seen a 60 degree chevy engine.

    I googled and searched for information about this 60 degree engine.
    I found this 60degree web page.
    Asked some silly questions.
    You guys helped me .
    I did not have the change to carry on all your suggestions,
    bacause of money and time.
    But I am satisfied with your help, thanks.
    Without internet , it would have been impossible to gain so much knowledge
    about this engine in one year.


    The compression ratio , engine 2850 cc :
    -stock 3400 head 28 cc , my modified 32cc
    -head gasket 0.040 hole 3.620"
    -bore 89.25 mm 3.5140"
    -stroke 76 mm 2.990"
    -piston zero deck height,flat top
    -piston valve reliefs 4 or 5 cc (it was difficult to measure)

    With 4 cc valve relief 12.11 and
    with 5 cc valve reliefs 11.86 compression ratio.
    I would consider 12:1 to be the best for my application.



    Leave a comment:


  • veekuusi
    replied
    Summer vacation goes on (1,5 weeks still to go) , so pretty much time to spend in garage.
    Had to do new brackets to alternator and hall sensor.
    When I lifted the engine to the car ,
    the engine bracket touched the alternator.

    4 weeks to the last race of this season.
    I try to be there.
    As almost all you know, this project is some half a year late.
    Still much work to do, I been waiting a dry sump pump now for 2 weeks.
    Hope it shows this week.










    Leave a comment:


  • pocket-rocket
    replied
    Originally posted by unchained01 View Post
    wow nice progress !!!


    Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2

    Leave a comment:


  • unchained01
    replied
    wow nice progress !!!

    Leave a comment:


  • veekuusi
    replied
    I put pretty much RTV silicon, because I want to be sure that oil is going
    to be inside of the engine. Maybe that is overkill, but had trouble with my
    old Ford engine. Oil was all over the place, except inside of the engine.









    Leave a comment:


  • SappySE107
    replied
    I was curious and did the math.

    Lift.....Intake.....Exhaust.....WT Intake.....WT Exhaust
    .040.....21.4.....18.2
    .079.....43.9.....36.7
    .118.....61.2.....55.5
    .157.....78.4.....68.4
    .196.....99.2.....92.....(.200)..116.7.....112.6
    .236.....120.6....112.7
    .276.....141.8....125..
    .315.....156.8....135.8
    .354.....174.4....142.2.....(.350)..187.3.....158. 4
    .393.....187.3....148.8
    .433.....196.4....151.7
    .472.....202.2....154.7
    .512.....206.4....155.1
    .551.....209.8....156.4.....(.550)..235.8.....178. 8

    Leave a comment:


  • veekuusi
    replied
    Originally posted by NateD4 View Post
    I presume the .58 LPS number is the BSFC for the engine? So the 337 HP is pretty close to what actual is?

    Or is the 337 HP based on airflow estimates without efficiency losses taken into account?
    I am not going to act like an expert in this flow bench case, bacause I am not an expert.
    But I think the LPS number is calculated with effiency lossen taken into count.
    Because it says corr. LPS.
    It would be nice if some one could correlate these flow numbers with WOT TECH flow numbers.

    I found this in the internet:
    cfm x 0.257 x number of cylinders
    236 x 0.257 x 6 = 364 hp

    And I want to say that , the porting was done by amators (me and my friend).
    But the flow bench test was done by pro, the best here in Finland.
    With the best equipment available.

    Pictures from today morning:







    Last edited by veekuusi; 08-07-2012, 12:35 PM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X