My 89 Camaro Project

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jonpro03
    • Jan 2007
    • 362

    #241
    Agreed

    1990 ASC/McLaren Turbo Grand Prix 3500 swap GT3076R turbo 40lb/hr injectors FMIC LX9 coils Megasquirt2 v3.0

    Comment

    • Alxsmt
      that one guy
      • Feb 2007
      • 725

      #242
      does it feel faster than the z24? I really wanna see what this thing can do when you get it sorted out
      sigpic
      88 Beretta CL- 13.641@102.76mph (rwd LS1/t56 conversion in progress)

      77 Celica GT- 3400/3500 swap in progress (engine from the beretta)

      Comment

      • Superdave
        Been there, Built that.
        • Sep 2004
        • 5850

        #243
        It's similar, but it's like apples to oranges.. The camaro hooks up much better than the Z24 did but it's not quite as fun with the auto trans.
        Past Builds;
        1991 Z24, 3500/5 Spd. 275WHP/259WTQ 13.07@108 MPH
        1989 Camaro RS, ITB-3500/700R4. 263WHP/263WTQ 13.52@99.2 MPH
        Current Project;
        1972 Nova 12.73@105.7 MPH

        Comment

        • Superdave
          Been there, Built that.
          • Sep 2004
          • 5850

          #244
          video...

          Past Builds;
          1991 Z24, 3500/5 Spd. 275WHP/259WTQ 13.07@108 MPH
          1989 Camaro RS, ITB-3500/700R4. 263WHP/263WTQ 13.52@99.2 MPH
          Current Project;
          1972 Nova 12.73@105.7 MPH

          Comment

          • SappySE107
            WOT-Tech
            • Oct 2003
            • 13520

            #245
            sounds great once it gets to higher RPM. Tuning has gotta be a bitch with those. Id love to see how the alpha n works on it.
            Ben
            60DegreeV6.com
            WOT-Tech.com

            Comment

            • ForcedFirebird
              Live life 3.7mi at a time
              • Jan 2007
              • 4555

              #246
              ...or a different "LIM". The size of those TB's might need to be closer to the head. Runner length is extremely important on ITB's. There's a few threads at ST about it.
              Links:
              WOT-Tech.com
              FaceBook
              Instagram

              Comment

              • Z3500
                • Jul 2011
                • 42

                #247
                That thing sounds bad as hell, I like it!!

                Comment

                • Z3500
                  • Jul 2011
                  • 42

                  #248
                  OK, I was just thinking about it, It seems flow would be increased be a shared intake, since the "mass" of the air is moving constantly in, diverted to each valve as it opens. ITB seems it has no flow until valve opens, then air is pulled in, then when the valve closes, the incoming airstream would in effect hit a brick wall and be reflected back out, causing unwanted turbulence. From what I understand, long intake runners helps low end torque, while short help high rpm power. Is there a way to fabricate a long intake that has a valve to close at higher RPM's to increase power over the entire RPM range?

                  I know I am out of my league on this one, but it seems to make sense to me somehow

                  Comment

                  • 2.8/3400 1985 Camaro
                    • Nov 2009
                    • 192

                    #249
                    Yes there are variable intake manifolds out there, some factory cars have them, fabricating one would be a pretty big undertaking though. Btw as far as squeezing more power out of that beast, throw some titanium rods at it, electric PS pump if you aren't manual steering, and an electric WP, I think I recall hearing mezierres are good for frequent use. As much as people hype about UDPs you would think there would be more aluminum pulleys, and electric accessories.
                    sigpic
                    http://www.cardomain.com/ride/390342...evrolet-camaro

                    Comment

                    • pocket-rocket
                      Because stock sucks...
                      • Oct 2003
                      • 6252

                      #250
                      Originally posted by Z3500 View Post
                      OK, I was just thinking about it, It seems flow would be increased be a shared intake, since the "mass" of the air is moving constantly in, diverted to each valve as it opens. ITB seems it has no flow until valve opens, then air is pulled in, then when the valve closes, the incoming airstream would in effect hit a brick wall and be reflected back out, causing unwanted turbulence. From what I understand, long intake runners helps low end torque, while short help high rpm power. Is there a way to fabricate a long intake that has a valve to close at higher RPM's to increase power over the entire RPM range?

                      I know I am out of my league on this one, but it seems to make sense to me somehow
                      The old (mid 90s) Ford Taurus SHO cars had them.

                      -60v6's 2nd Jon M.
                      91 Black Lumina Z34-5 speed
                      92 Black Lumina Z34 5 speed (getting there, slowly... follow the progress here)
                      94 Red Ford Ranger 2WD-5 speed
                      Originally posted by Jay Leno
                      Tires are cheap clutches...

                      Comment

                      • geldartb
                        The Situation
                        • May 2004
                        • 1994

                        #251
                        Originally posted by pocket-rocket View Post
                        The old (mid 90s) Ford Taurus SHO cars had them.

                        it has 6 individual butterflies one for each runner. wonder how much work it would take to mod this to work on a 3x00
                        http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/90-TA...item5ae1dc537e

                        i know that isn't the lower just used it to describe.
                        Last edited by geldartb; 08-27-2011, 05:13 PM.
                        sigpic
                        99 Grand Am GT
                        3400/3500 -Solid trans mount--TCE 65mm T-body---85mm LS2 maf---1 1/4' TCE intake spacers with 3400 upper--SLP Catback with flowmaster 80--TOG headers
                        Modded 3400 lifters with LT1 springs---Comp Cams 26986 Springs
                        1357 cam 227 233 .050 dur
                        515 515 lift 112 lsa
                        15.232@88.85mph on stock 3400---New time to come


                        Comment

                        • pocket-rocket
                          Because stock sucks...
                          • Oct 2003
                          • 6252

                          #252
                          Originally posted by geldartb View Post
                          it has 6 individual butterflies one for each runner. wonder how much work it would take to mod this to work on a 3x00
                          http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/90-TA...item5ae1dc537e

                          i know that isn't the lower just used it to describe.
                          Interesting... You certainly can't beat the price, either.
                          -60v6's 2nd Jon M.
                          91 Black Lumina Z34-5 speed
                          92 Black Lumina Z34 5 speed (getting there, slowly... follow the progress here)
                          94 Red Ford Ranger 2WD-5 speed
                          Originally posted by Jay Leno
                          Tires are cheap clutches...

                          Comment

                          • Superdave
                            Been there, Built that.
                            • Sep 2004
                            • 5850

                            #253
                            So, i got bored this morning and cut out a form for a fiberglass old school scoop... Probably won't use it but i thought it might be worth posting for a few laughs...

                            Past Builds;
                            1991 Z24, 3500/5 Spd. 275WHP/259WTQ 13.07@108 MPH
                            1989 Camaro RS, ITB-3500/700R4. 263WHP/263WTQ 13.52@99.2 MPH
                            Current Project;
                            1972 Nova 12.73@105.7 MPH

                            Comment

                            • torq455
                              If I only had money!!!
                              • Dec 2003
                              • 1615

                              #254
                              How are you board?
                              Last edited by torq455; 09-17-2011, 07:45 PM.
                              Andy

                              sigpic

                              fastest 1/8: 10.19@ 67.17
                              fastest 1/4: 16.16@ 82.70

                              62mm TB, 1.6 roller tip rockers, Ostrich 2.0, UD pulley, TB heater bypass, K&N, 180* stat, No cat, 99Grand AM dual cooling fans. 4T65E swap FDR 3.69, EP LSD, F.A.S.T. transmission controller, TransGo shift kit.

                              Comment

                              • SappySE107
                                WOT-Tech
                                • Oct 2003
                                • 13520

                                #255
                                Looks like a cow bell:P
                                Ben
                                60DegreeV6.com
                                WOT-Tech.com

                                Comment

                                Working...