Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

96 Beretta Project

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 3400-95-Modified
    replied
    You can see if varries on which area overlaps for each port, so if you start with a stock gasket and then go to a felpro and even DON'T go "over" the stock size then you will have overlap from the felpro.







    I don't think I went oversized on this... then again I'm not versed at porting.



    The other thing is, if I go slightly over, or see a tiny spot that overlaps with the plastic I can trim that just a tiny bit to fix it, there is enough plastic there to trim it a little, where the Felpro's its the rubber and you can't trim that to correct an error.

    The Felpro overlap



    And yes I have a tiny bit in the right corner where it overlaps, I'll admit to that being slightly over cut, but no where near how much overlaps everywhere with the felpro's

    Leave a comment:


  • 3400-95-Modified
    replied
    I got some good pics and I'll post them soon. I just need to transfer them to the PC... Breakfast first.

    Leave a comment:


  • bob442
    replied
    i wouldnt trust anything but felpro. even if they over lapped a bit.are the felpro gasket numbers all that same for the 3x00's?

    Leave a comment:


  • 3400-95-Modified
    replied
    I'll take a picture for you when I get home. *Note this will be a set that has been installed before.

    Leave a comment:


  • SappySE107
    replied
    Felpro is not smaller anywhere. I can't take a good picture to show you the trace of the stocker on a head and then the felpro on the head, but there is no overlap.

    Leave a comment:


  • 3400-95-Modified
    replied
    I gasket matched to stock gaskets and the felpro's are smaller... Don't know what to say about that unless you don't gasket match to the stock ones. It's been like that since I built the engine and the stockers fit perfect.

    Leave a comment:


  • SappySE107
    replied
    The felpro gasket shouldn't stick into your port work unless you went too far.

    Leave a comment:


  • 3400-95-Modified
    replied
    Well as of right now it looks like I'll be going back to the OEM GM LIM gaskets because the Felpro ones do not have the same opening as those do. I didn't look it it much when I swapped them over before, but now that I line it up and check it, there are many overlaps where the stock ones do not. Granted this is probably because I ported my setup to the stock type gaskets, but since I've done that I guess I've limited myself to using those.

    I don't really have a problem with that since this is not my daily car, but I will definitely be keeping an eye on them.

    Leave a comment:


  • 3400-95-Modified
    replied
    I'd love to see how just 3400 Clevite bearings do in this application alone... Unfortunately Rockauto doesn't list them for our application. I'm not sure why. I'm thinking those would respond just as Dave's did and just wear rather than pit and crater like the babbitt material does.

    EDIT* found the Clevite's on Rockauto, They only list it as a 1980-03 3x00 bearing... not 05 where I have been searching. That's odd... Yet Clevite's own PDF lists all these applications to have the same bearings.


    173 CID (2.8L) Chevrolet LPG V6 Cyl (1987-1989) 3.504in./89mm x 2.992in./76mm
    173 CID (2.8L) Chevrolet Meth V6 Cyl (1987-1989) 3.504in./89mm x 2.992in./76mm
    189 CID (3.1L) Chevrolet V6 Cyl (1988-2005) 3.504in./89mm x 3.307in./84mm
    189 CID (3.1L) Chevrolet Turbocharged V6 Cyl (1989-1990) 3.504in./89mm x 3.307in./84mm
    189 CID (3.1L) Chevrolet LPG V6 Cyl (1988-1993) 3.504in./89mm x 3.307in./84mm
    189 CID (3.1L) Chevrolet Meth V6 Cyl (1988-1993) 3.504in./89mm x 3.307in./84mm
    189 CID (3.1L) L64 Chevrolet Flex V6 Cyl (1993) 3.504in./89mm x 3.307in./84mm
    207 CID (3.4L) L32 Chevrolet V6 Cyl (1993-1995) 3.622in./92mm x 3.307in./84mm
    207 CID (3.4L) LA1 Chevrolet V6 Cyl (1996-2005) 3.622in./92mm x 3.307in./84mm


    In case anyone cares I attached Clevite's main catalog

    Our block is page 374 block #41 and the 350 is 388-389 block #73
    Attached Files
    Last edited by 3400-95-Modified; 02-11-2010, 03:45 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • IsaacHayes
    replied
    I have 3500 heads with 3500 OEM gaskets on it, so it's not metal. It *MIGHT* be fresh enough (only 5k) to re-use the plastic one, if it looks ok. I always check for water vapor in the oil cap so even if it does start leaking later I'll catch it and fix it with metal. For now I think I'll try to re-use the plastic OEM one. Yeah the sealed power bearings obviously are flawed and don't meet OEM strength... With the extra spring pressure and ramp rates from the cam the SBC bearings are a nice upgrade. Should last just as long as OEM bearings and cam I'd think with Clevite and more surface area to ride on.

    Leave a comment:


  • 3400-95-Modified
    replied
    I'm not sure about the power builders book since I got the info from here

    I put RTV around the coolant port on both sides, and yes I put some on the threads, One engine I used Plumbers tape on the threads since they go right into the coolant port, they are not a blind hole, the are through holes into the water jacket.

    If you have the metal LIMG then just remove the LIM... they are reusable. Much easier and safer to do it that way.

    That above picture is the what happened to the bearing after 60k of a STOCK cam.. LOL That's not even one of the pics from pinky's motor

    Leave a comment:


  • IsaacHayes
    replied
    Didn't the 60V6 power builders book or whatever suggest the SBC bearings too?

    Did you put RTV just around the coolant port and not the whole gasket? On both sides of the gasket? Did you put some on the threads of the bolts too?

    I suppose if one really wanted to, a powerful rare earth magnet on a string/wire to hold up each lifter with the pushrods removed could work to keep the LIM on, but not sure if you can remove the pushrods with the LIM in place though...

    Good photo there, I see the block journal is wider than the stock bearing too. Damn that bearing is messed up. I'm going to replace the bearings in my motor (at least just the cam ones) now with the SBC ones. That is unless I find out they are not sealed power brand.

    Leave a comment:


  • 3400-95-Modified
    replied
    It might have just been my tool that caused issues... Put it this way, a light rub with sand paper made the tool fit like a glove.

    Raw data.
    3400 cam bearing diameters.

    Bearing OD spec range
    1 - 2.009-2.011
    2&3 - 1.999-2.001
    4 - 2.009-2.011

    STD Shaft Diameter
    1.8677-1.8697

    350 Cam bearings

    Bearing OD spec range
    1 - 2.019-2.021
    2&5 - 2.009-2.011
    3&4 - 1.999-2.001

    STD Shaft Diameter
    1.8682-1.8692


    If you compare all those numbers the bearings installed are spot on with our spec range.

    If your that worried use thinner oil.

    Trust me its within spec, and there are a few others already doing this.

    If you order the Clevite cam bearings they are supposedly the same material as the 350 ones. So if your that concerned about the size then just get the Clevite ones and not the sealed power ones and you may not have the issues I had with those.

    Just be sure your getting the SH-1364S part number. The SH-1349S is the 350's

    When I posted about the issue I had with my tool, a topic i read somewhere from TCE came to mind, that the 350's OD's are a tiny bit larger, which would make them fit a bit tighter in the bore, which could make a tool get stuck... Then again this could also be due to the cheapness of the tool I have... It may not be machined properly which gave me my slight sticking issue.. After going through and finding these numbers I see the only difference is the range of our shaft diameter is larger than that of the SBC... so ONLY if the cam you have is 1.8697 and the bearings are 1.8692 when installed would you have an issue, but then the cam just wouldn't fit... Odds of that are VERY slim.

    Either way my cam installed just fine with a layer of assy lube on it too, so I think I'm all set.
    Last edited by 3400-95-Modified; 02-11-2010, 12:21 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • bszopi
    replied
    Its not the diameter of the bearings that is different, its the width. If the diameter was different, they wouldn't fit in the block.

    Leave a comment:


  • bob442
    replied
    your not worried about less clearance between the bearings and the journals on the cam? if the bearings are slightly larger that the stock (O.D) wouldnt that suggest there would be a change in the I.D of the bearing? i'm not fully sold on using the SBC bearings.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X